Anita claimed here:

"Did anyone ever apologize for contacting my school by the way and telling them all about my personal paranormal investigation that I do on my spare time and that has nothing to do with my professional life and for saying that I am mentally ill and what not?"

This is a lie. I did contact her school's counseling center by sending them the address to her website. I offered no conclusions, and no specifics. I did not say she was mentally ill, and I did not tell them "all about" her paranormal investigation. That was the beginning and end of my contact with her university. The counseling center is bound by law to protect her privacy, which was why I contacted them and not the school administration. Furthermore, I see no cause to apologize for attempting to open communication between a mental health professional at the school and an obviously mentally disturbed student. It did not, and does not, legally qualify as harassment.

That said, though, I'm getting tired of Anita calling me a liar on this point, and exaggerating the details of an email she was not privy to, on a forum where I am not permitted to defend against her lies.  Any further comments or accusations by you on this issue,  Anita, on the JREF or anywhere else, and I will have no qualms about contacting the university administration, and the faculty of your school, and appraising them of the details of al your publicly made claims. I'm posting this openly here, so there will be no mistake about my intention, should you continue to offer misleading, defamatory, and dishonest statements about the issue. I freely and solely take responsibility for my subsequent action if you do not desist.

You are, in the opinion of many ethical and honest people, severely mentally disturbed, and, in this post Columbine/Virginia Tech era, it would benefit the school administration and the faculty to be made aware of such concerns.

Don't publicly address the subject again, on any forum. You are not honest about it, and I will not tolerate it further.

(UY, I will certainly understand if you remove this post-but I could no longer be accused of something I did not do, when I have been consistently straightforward about what I actually did.)

Anita also claimed:

"Meanwhile you guys are snooping around my business left and right and one day I won't be surprised if I'll find one of y'all going through my trash for some evidence against my claim or to try to prove that I'd be delusional."

This is another lie. No one has made any attempt to 'snoop' into Anita's private life. This suggests that people have made attempts to gather information about Anita, such as private documents, etc, without her knowledge. She has no evidence to support this claim, since it simply isn't true. Without evidence, this statement could legally be defined as libelous.

Please, if the reader has been following along with Anita's presence on the Internet, or is just becoming aware of her, take such statements by her with a pound of salt. She is rarely honest, but, on these points, she isn't being honest at all. She has not beeen harassed or victimized. She would not "be delusional"...she IS delusional.

Okay, then, Anita. You can't say you weren't warned, or given the opportunity to either drop the issue or stop lying about it. Since your response is to continue to lie,. I have no qualms about contacting your university administration and the faculty.

Desertgal, what brought on your second post? It looks to be in response to something Anita said.

That said, there's no reason to be contacting her university adminstration or faculty. She lies, we call her on it. I see no reason to bring in a third party.

"By her own account, desertgal had contacted my university to tell them that she thinks my investigation is mental illness."

From her website. This is a lie. "By her own account"? I never offered any conclusions to the counseling center at her university at all. I've said this numerous times. Anita knows this. She chooses to disregard it and lie instead, in order to play the victim. Pathetic.

I also would never say that her "investigation is mental illness". That doesn't even make sense.

The rest of her statements are barely worth noting. I openly rescinded my previous statement that Anita suffers specifically  from schizotypal disorder-I've said that a number of times. I see no need to do it yet again.

The remainder is simply evidence that Anita is as prejudiced against those with mental illness as she is against blacks. But, then, bigotry and racism do often go hand in hand, and I didn't expect otherwise from her.

In the end, her posts about this on her website merely solidify my credibility, so, really, she is just shooting herself in the foot by keeping them up there.

The opinion of someone as dishonest, delusional and prejudiced as Anita means nothing to me. And the "Love ya, Desertgal" is simply repugnant for the lie that it is.

Again, a university should be made aware when one of their students is as mentally disturbed as Anita. Since UY doesn't agree, I'l say nothing further about it here.