Register  
Sunday, May 20, 2012
Discussion 

Automatic Southwest Boarding Pass Check-in Software/Script

Forums
Detecting missing kidneys
Last Post 26 Apr 2010 12:43 PM by UncaYimmy. 25 Replies.
AddThis - Bookmarking and Sharing ButtonPrinter Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrevNextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2 << < 12
AuthorMessages
desertgalUser is Offline
V.P. of Patient Relations
Stripes Earned - Respect Me
Stripes Earned - Respect Me
Send Private Message
Posts:1030

--
19 Nov 2009 06:11 PM  
Posted By VisionFromFeeling on 19 Nov 2009 08:31 AM

As I said, I did the reading with the woman at the very end of the meeting.

So, you observed this gal throughout the meeting, and likely also observed that she appeared to be hard of hearing in one ear.  Pure cold reading.

And my claim is not to detect miniscule kidney stones when they are not causing any pain. I only claim to do, what I have been able to do in the past.

Ah. So, you claim you can detect bacteria in the stomach when it isn't causing any pain, but not larger kidney stones. You can see into the body at the atomic level, but you can't see kidney stones.

Right.

Once again, it is "my 'ability' works, except when it doesn't, which is whenever my guesswork fails and cold reading isn't possible."

"The only time you can read the future from cards is when you are holding four aces in a poker game." - Pernell Roberts
ChimeraUser is Offline
Newbie
Newbie
Send Private Message
Posts:3

--
25 Apr 2010 08:50 PM  
Just noticed this over at the JREF...Deja Vu:

[QUOTE=UncaYimmy;5864483]
She also did a "reading" trying to guess my ailments, and [URL="http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=4262439#post4262439"]she got them horribly wrong[/URL]. Her conclusion: Her ability doesn't work from photos like she thought. That means the test was successful in defining her abilities.

[/QUOTE]


[URL="http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=4262439#post4262439"]In response to a miss:[/URL]

[QUOTE=VisionFromFeeling] Although it is not permissible to make claims afterwards, I did detect an issue with the right wrist [B]but failed to mention it[/B]. This does not count but for my purposes I am interested. [/QUOTE]


[URL="http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=4262439#post4262439"]In response to another miss:[/URL]

[QUOTE=VisionFromFeeling]The first thing I detected was knee problems but [B]I failed to mention this[/B]. It does not count but is interesting for my own record. [/QUOTE]



ChimeraUser is Offline
Newbie
Newbie
Send Private Message
Posts:3

--
25 Apr 2010 08:58 PM  

Whoops, that was a mess. Let me try again:

2 quotes from an early reading of UY show that she's been using the "I detected it but failed to mention it" excuse for quite some time.

 From this thread:

http://forums.randi.org/showthread....ost5864483


"Although it is not permissible to make claims afterwards, I did detect an issue with the right wrist but failed to mention it. This does not count but for my purposes I am interested."

AND


"The first thing I detected was knee problems but I failed to mention this. It does not count but is interesting for my own record. "

 

Hmmm...
 

desertgalUser is Offline
V.P. of Patient Relations
Stripes Earned - Respect Me
Stripes Earned - Respect Me
Send Private Message
Posts:1030

--
25 Apr 2010 11:50 PM  
Posted By Chimera on 25 Apr 2010 12:58 PM

Whoops, that was a mess. Let me try again:

2 quotes from an early reading of UY show that she's been using the "I detected it but failed to mention it" excuse for quite some time.

 From this thread:

http://forums.randi.org/showthread....ost5864483


"Although it is not permissible to make claims afterwards, I did detect an issue with the right wrist but failed to mention it. This does not count but for my purposes I am interested."

AND


"The first thing I detected was knee problems but I failed to mention this. It does not count but is interesting for my own record. "

 

Hmmm...
 

Yes, and interestingly enough, after the "postdicting" about UY, any number of people warned that the one thing that would damage her credibility the most would be continued postdictions. So, what was the next thing she did? Postdicted Dr. Carlson's missing kidney.

Perfect example of Anita's complete disregard for....well, anything but the thoughts in her own head.

"The only time you can read the future from cards is when you are holding four aces in a poker game." - Pernell Roberts
DaylightstarUser is Offline
One of the Gang
One of the Gang
Send Private Message
Posts:187

--
26 Apr 2010 12:59 AM  
That disregard popped up all the time. Certainly during protocol talks.
When I recently mentioned on the jreff her removing her advance statement from her site about announcing her claim as falsified in case of failure at the IIG test and mentioned that this was fraudulent behavior, she went ahead and messed with moderated content and got banned.
I mean, that's the sort of stuff you'd be a bit careful with.

She just does not pay attention. The universe inside her skull is already too big for her to also mind the universe outside of her skull.
I
UncaYimmyUser is Offline
Your Brilliancy
Leader of the Pack
Leader of the Pack
Send Private Message
Posts:1156

--
26 Apr 2010 12:43 PM  
Hey, but she said it wasn't permissible and didn't count. Doesn't that make it okay?
UncaYimmy
Web Design and Virtual Marketing
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2 << < 12



Powered by Active Forums
 Print   
Private Messages
You must be logged in to use this module.
  
Copyright 2009-2012 by Jim Carr   |  Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use