Posted By bookitty on 26 Sep 2009 10:06 PM
Posted By VisionFromFeeling on 26 Sep 2009 09:59 PM
Thanks bookitty, let's do this test when I arrive to California. I'd be happy to. I realize that there is absolutely no way to confirm that I have not read up on the medical effects of structures, after all I think doctors of medicine should know these things. But at the very least, if I make mistakes, then that settles it.
Stop with the manipulation. This test, regardless of the outcome will "settle" nothing. Of all the tests you have proposed, this one carries with it the highest possibility of cheating. So passing would be suspect, at the very least.
If you fail, it will only confirm that you were happy to waste my time in order to be the center of attention. "Settled" is not the word you want to use in that case. Unsettled is much closer.
bookitty, what's wrong with you? What does this mean:
If you come to Los Angeles, I will be happy to put you in a closed room with 20 images of a chemical structure, a piece of paper and a pen. If you get better than chance, you may have something. Or it may be that chemical structures are similar enough to provide clues on their own.
First you offer to set up a test for me. And when I accept to take your test, you say that I am manipulating. Why don't you set the conditions for pass/fail of our test? Let's see... if I fail the test, I have to falsify all claims and resume to being a normal student, right? No more IIG test. And how about I give you $10,000 and ownership to my website if I fail our test. (No.)