For some reason Anita refuses to post here even though she has a verified account. Instead she either sends me IMs or e-mails. Now she's updating her website with responses.
In this case she claiming that I was wrong to say she failed the chemical identification test with crushed pills. She's claiming that she never actually took the test. Nonsense. I say she failed because she actually failed.
From one of her links "supporting" her argument she says, "I have detected clues about the pill samples but I want more time with them before I post my conclusions. If you think I should put your pill test before my studies then you are just wrong. I am not going to stare at some powdered pills when I should be reading." She's had months with those pills, and school is long over for the year (too bad she didn't get her 4.0 back).
She didn't link to
this post where she said, "The crushed pill samples are still waiting for me to have time to pay them some more attention.
I've already spent two hours on them and I am not ready to post any answers even though
I've perceived clues as to what they might be. I need more time with them, but you have no idea how busy I am with school, and now the study is approaching."
In the
Interview Thread she said, "When I want to make detailed observations or to describe what I am looking at I spend a
few seconds up to a few minutes on a perception. When I encounter new information I can spend several minutes on it to learn to understand what I am looking at."
Conclusion: She failed, but she won't admit it.