Agatha
One of the Gang
Posts:58
 | | 26 Nov 2009 10:50 PM |
| People can ignore my post above as it was directed at "Please Shut Up", and the post has been deleted. | | | Discourse ye unto the hand; for verily, the face listeneth not. | |
|
Akhenaten
Stripes Earned - Respect Me
Posts:618
| | 26 Nov 2009 11:12 PM |
| That was a strange one wasn't it? Started out OK but then went all visiony. | | | The moving finger writes and having writ, moves on.
Nor all thy piety nor wit shall lure it back to cancel half a line.
Nor all thy tears wash out a word of it.
- from The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, who really should have read the FAQ and learned about the Edit function. | |
|
Daylightstar
One of the Gang
Posts:187
| | 26 Nov 2009 11:50 PM |
| I didn't even see the post, but I'm still getting vibrations. | | | |
|
catbasket
One of the Gang
Posts:91
| | 26 Nov 2009 11:53 PM |
| There did seem to be a slight air of socks around the place for a short while. | | | |
|
UncaYimmy
Your Brilliancy
Leader of the Pack
Posts:1156
| | 27 Nov 2009 01:18 AM |
| I'm pretty sure it wasn't a sock of anyone here. I checked the logs and nobody from that Internet service provider has logged on before. It wasn't an anonymous proxy either. It was just some knucklehead posting a hit and run. I have changed the registration program to require e-mail validation in order to post. I don't like annoying people with that, but I do not want this to get out of hand. | | UncaYimmy
Web Design and Virtual Marketing | |
|
Farencue
One of the Gang
Posts:176
| | 27 Nov 2009 01:24 AM |
| Keep digging Anita, you have almost buried yourself.
I wonder if SezMe will share the details of Anita's post demonstration behaviour, he does not seem too impressed with you either Anita. I wonder why that is?
You appear to have a nasty habit of putting people you come into contact with off side. Lex told us that it is common knowledge amongst the faculty that you acted INAPPROPRIATELY with a professor. It upset him so much he immediately reported it at a faculty meeting.
In other words Anita, YOUR inappropriate behaviour is common knowledge among the faculty.
It is not rumour or innuendo but fact. The professor reported YOUR inappropriate behaviour to the faculty.
I also heard you have a habit of downloading people's facebook pictures and editing them, then sending them to the owner with your own comments. That is creepy behaviour.
I also heard your on campus behaviour towards other students is weird. I would say it's typical from what I have observed of you over the past year.
I also think that you clinging to your ALMOST 4.0 is a JOKE. Are you afraid you will get kicked out of the club for slipping?
Care to sue me? Or perhaps calling the university police will do the trick.
You are a nasty piece of work Anita and if you wish to do penance you should write a public THANKYOU to the IIG for their time and effort putting up with your crap on the JREF.
Buh bye Anita - your time in the sun has finished.
| | | |
|
UncaYimmy
Your Brilliancy
Leader of the Pack
Posts:1156
| | 27 Nov 2009 01:28 AM |
| BTW, there was one diagnostic criterion for Narcissistic Personality Disorder that we could never determine for sure:
"is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her"
Now, we have. She says that other students are jealous of her 4.0 (the 4.0 she doesn't actually have). She also once again pointed out that Brent Atwater is charging $1,700 to do what Anita does for free.
| | UncaYimmy
Web Design and Virtual Marketing | |
|
Farencue
One of the Gang
Posts:176
| | 27 Nov 2009 01:38 AM |
| "is often envious of others......"
Brent Atwater was studied at the Rhine Research Center. Brent Atwater has real woo credentials to hold up her reputation and is probably making a few merry bucks. One small thing, Anita's artwork seemed remarkably similar to Brent's to me and when I asked Anita if she liked a particular piece of Brent's work entitled "Ballet dancer" or similar, the artwork disappeared from Anita's site. Now I would hate to be sued so I'm just pointing out the coincidence.
Poor old Anita thought she would go the sciencey route to get her cred, but has yet to realise she is an epic fail. She should have just gone the route the other woos have gone - the tried and tested one. But no, Anita always thinks she is one up on everyone else, including the woo AND skeptical communities.
I mentioned Brent Atwater way back when, the coincidences were too paranormal for me to overlook. So I did my investigation and concluded that Anita is a Brent wannabe. If I am wrong then I will sue myself. | | | |
|
pakeha
Groupie
Posts:27
| | 27 Nov 2009 02:14 AM |
| Farencue, you could well be right.
While the charitable call AI delusional, I think these latest posts show the real woman.
Wanting to sue UncaJimmy.
Good God.
When I remember the time and effort that has been dedicated by UncaJimmy to helping AI define her claims and fashion a protocol which accurately reflected her ever shifting goalposts, I'm reminded of the Spanish proverb or aphorism or whatever:
No good deed goes unpunished
would be the closest English version of it.
El comedido sale perdiendo.
| | | |
|
lexvonrockets
Honorary Meanie
Newbie
Posts:7
| | 27 Nov 2009 02:27 AM |
| I can think of no better example of harassment as what Anita is currently doing to me. The fervor with which she reconstructs reality and spams it to you is totally unmatched. Hey Anita, are you reading this? Of course you are. I know I said that I already posted our last correspondence, and I really did mean to. I just wanted you to know that nothing I post on this forum, or any other forum, or anywhere else ever again is for you. I can tell that you think everything is about you, but it's really not. I'm just your run-of-the-mill skeptic-next door, reading about stuff and corresponding with other folks interested in reason and critical thinking. So, like, step off. Seriously. Anyway, to the rest of the folks here - I did reply to Anita's open-letter to me, but I didn't realize that it was an open-letter at fist (Jim let me know), so I sent her a private message. I figured, with this new information, I might as well make my response an "open-reply," eh?? SO here it is: You are being ridiculous. You should be careful about your assumptions, I will remind you that I never said that you flirted with Dr. X and I have never mentioned Dr. Y in the context of you either. Your suggestion that I am plotting either the professional or personal demise of one or both of these fine gentlemen is comical.
Other people talk about you, you know. You were the star of a well-publicized Internet broadcast, and you certainly do seem eager to hear what ppl have to say about that.
I would appreciate it if you would stop threatening me, or anyone else for that matter. Your frenetic messages are obsessive and overwhelming, and you should consider the fact that others are not to blame for any alleged rumours concerning you. It is apparent that you are the source of most, if not all of this gossip,
I'll repeat, do not approach me again in this threatening manner. I don't know why you have chosen to attempt to bully me, but you are very much barking up the wrong tree, as they say.
This is the last correspondence you will receive from me. | | | The displacement of the idea that facts and evidence matter by the idea that everything boils down to subjective interests and perspectives is – second only to American political campaigns – the most prominent and pernicious manifestation of anti-intellectualism in our time. Larry Laudan, Science and Relativism, 1990. | |
|
Farencue
One of the Gang
Posts:176
| | 27 Nov 2009 02:55 AM |
| Posted By pakeha on 26 Nov 2009 06:14 PM
Farencue, you could well be right.
While the charitable call AI delusional, I think these latest posts show the real woman.
Wanting to sue UncaJimmy.
Good God.
When I remember the time and effort that has been dedicated by UncaJimmy to helping AI define her claims and fashion a protocol which accurately reflected her ever shifting goalposts, I'm reminded of the Spanish proverb or aphorism or whatever:
No good deed goes unpunished
would be the closest English version of it.
El comedido sale perdiendo.
Yeah, I remember when UncaYimmy was the best thing since sliced bread LOL | | | |
|
Farencue
One of the Gang
Posts:176
| | 27 Nov 2009 03:14 AM |
| Hey Lex
I'm sorry that Anita chose to publicise your name here, I think it is a perfect example of her character.
Evil bunny boiler springs to mind, and I would keep a careful eye on Anita until she is eventually kicked out of university.
She has dug her own hole with her arrogance and contempt for others, this pathetic attempt by her to divert attention away from her own behaviour is typical.
Humility is not Anita's fortitude.
So you shared with us that Anita acted inappropriately toward a professor, who reported it at a faculty meeting. That doesn't sound like innuendo or gossip to me. The professor was right to report Anita and I hope the incident is on record at the UNCC.
Anita is just mad at you because she likes to present herself as a breathy, ditzy innocent. We all know different, but Anita likes to keep her fantasies about herself intact. Especially the ones where she is thinks she is desired by others.
You did nothing wrong in the chatroom, I don't think anyone did. It was a live chat and we all saw fit at the time to chat the way we did. So sue us.
I enjoyed the other UNCC students' company and comments also. | | | |
|
Christa
One of the Gang
Posts:55
| | 27 Nov 2009 06:59 AM |
| I'm so confused. I step out for a little Thanksgiving turkey and return to ... this mess. I've read most of the chat logs (there are 2, right?) and followed the JREF thread. I don't see how we've gotten to the point where Anita has any legitimate claim of harrassment. ( Besides, it's nuts to even use the phrase "legitimate claim" in any sentence involving Anita Ikonen.) How has Anita been harassed? Her letter does not make this clear. Is there a backstory that I don't know about? | | | |
|
Akhenaten
Stripes Earned - Respect Me
Posts:618
| | 27 Nov 2009 08:47 AM |
| Nup. No backstory. Just Anita's fantasies again. Getting further out there, aren't they?
@ lex.
I'm not sure how you're feeling at the moment about having your name out there in all this, but if it's any consolation, I think you can take pride in the fact.
Anita wasn't doing your Universty's name a whole lot of good, but you most certainly are.
Go you! | | | The moving finger writes and having writ, moves on.
Nor all thy piety nor wit shall lure it back to cancel half a line.
Nor all thy tears wash out a word of it.
- from The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, who really should have read the FAQ and learned about the Edit function. | |
|
UncaYimmy
Your Brilliancy
Leader of the Pack
Posts:1156
| | 27 Nov 2009 09:10 AM |
| Anita has periodically accused me of "harassing" her by, you know, replying to her public comments. She threatened to call the authorities back when people were upset by her comments about black people. She was furious that I did nothing about it, and she repeatedly called my cell phone to complain about the harassment. Ironic, huh? Anita has been upset with Lex for her comments about the rumors regarding Anita making inappropriate comments to a professor she refused to name. Anita responded, "The only reason I spoke with Dr. X was because..." She was the one who brought up that person's name. Interesting, huh? Regarding Dr. Y, another person at UNCC with whom I have had contact suggested that Dr. Y might be the Meanie Professor. So, I found his picture and sent it to Anita saying, "Do you think he's handsome?" I did it to yank her chain. Anita then publicly accused Lexi of telling people that Anita made inappropriate comments to Dr. Y. This did not happen. Why did I decide to yank Anita's chain? Obviously, like many others I was annoyed with her for breaking her word regarding the test. I was also irritated by the first messages she sent to me after the test: Mr. Carr, you happen to be a bit on the chubby side as well. Not just me. So. What'd you think of the show?
2:01pm
Anita
Ahem. The SHOW, not my body, that is. What'd you think? Did you hear me say hi to you?
SezMe from the JREF Forums was there, and I gave him a hug.
2:09pm
Anita
Jim, someone has close-up photos from close to the stage posted. I will see if I can get copies and put on my webpage. I also have a few fun backstage pics!
2:11pm
Anita
On some of those pics you can really see my chest. I know you'd like that, considering you asked for such pics in the past. Well, now it's gonna be posted. You said it, not me.
It seems she can dish it out but she can't take. It's also interesting to note that Anita publicly accused an unnamed professor at UNCC of physically and verbally abusing her. She said the reported it to the administration, but nothing was done. And yet she's accusing Lexi of libel? Huh? Some of us expressed concern that Anita would become unhinged after failing the IIG test. Seems like our fears were well founded. | | UncaYimmy
Web Design and Virtual Marketing | |
|
Christa
One of the Gang
Posts:55
| | 27 Nov 2009 09:41 AM |
| Oh, okay. Thx, UncaYimmy. So she's just raging and ranting. On another topic, I don't think any of the comments about her appearance were untoward or unfair, and I certainly wouldn't have apologized. This was a bunch of people hanging out in a chat room joking around while some wannabe fraud made an idiot out of herself, not a State funeral. She voluntarily put herself in the public eye with her foolishness, and everything is fair game. If she'd looked nice and gotten compliments, she'd have been thrilled. I thought you went easy on her. I shudder to think what will happen if Santa brings her a full-length mirror this Xmas. | | | |
|
UncaYimmy
Your Brilliancy
Leader of the Pack
Posts:1156
| | 27 Nov 2009 10:02 AM |
| I agree, Christa. Anita posted a series of pics on her Facebook page. She told us how she got a special hair-do that she designed just for the occasion (she loves that white dye). She told us she put on a lot of makeup - much more than usual. She wore high heels that were just impractical for the test and had to remove them. She wore a form-fitting knit dress (white, even though it's after Labor Day), white stockings, and a necklace around what I assume is what she believes is her waist. Everyone else wore practical clothes.
Clearly Anita was playing it up for the cameras. She got what she wanted - people talking about her appearance. Unfortunately for her, the comments were less than flattering. Like you said, people did what people do - they chatted about what they saw. Nobody forced her to read the comments.
| | UncaYimmy
Web Design and Virtual Marketing | |
|
catbasket
One of the Gang
Posts:91
| | 27 Nov 2009 01:29 PM |
| Posted By UncaYimmy on 26 Nov 2009 05:18 PM
It was just some knucklehead posting a hit and run.
I sit corrected! | | | |
|
UncaYimmy
Your Brilliancy
Leader of the Pack
Posts:1156
| | 28 Nov 2009 12:15 AM |
| Catbasket - The only reason I went through the logs was because I thought it was a sock puppet myself. I was surprised as anyone that it wasn't. | | UncaYimmy
Web Design and Virtual Marketing | |
|
desertgal
V.P. of Patient Relations
Stripes Earned - Respect Me
Posts:1030
| | 28 Nov 2009 01:06 AM |
| Posted By Akhenaten on 27 Nov 2009 12:47 AM
Anita wasn't doing your Universty's name a whole lot of good, but you most certainly are.
Go you! I second that.  Anita should do herself a big favor and shut the hell up already. As well, Lex, although I'm sure you don't need to be told this, I'll say it anyway, out of concern: please be careful, especially when you come into physical proximity with Anita. Most importantly, never meet with her alone. I know, I probably sound like a tiresome grandma when I say that, but it is widely agreed that this woman has some significant mental issues, and that makes her unpredictable and possibly dangerous. Please...take care. | | | "The only time you can read the future from cards is when you are holding four aces in a poker game." - Pernell Roberts | |
|