Anita claims she has had a tummy ache ever since she ate raw oats.

Maybe she isn't a horse but it could be an out for the IIG test.

By the way Anita, your spectacular ATTEMPT to derail any logical discussion with your latest JREF post titled LIGHT PIXELS should be noted.

Getting a little uncomfortable is it, now that Ness has come onto the scene?

Your very unspectacular attempts to dodge Ness' questions are duly noted.

Posted By UncaYimmy on 18 Nov 2009 10:28 PM
What I want to know is what the hell are raw oats and why would anyone be eating them?

Muesli. A good question, since they cause gases, sorry, tummyache.

Posted By UncaYimmy on 18 Nov 2009 10:28 PM
What I want to know is what the hell are raw oats and why would anyone be eating them?

I just hope she's referring to Quaker Oats and didn't actually go into a field and start grazing.

D'you reckon these visions coud be produced by ergot poisoning from eating organic muesli?
 

added: Grazing in an oat field. Would that account for the expression on the woman's face in that new photo?

You guys are just rude. Of course there is no "out" for the IIG test. I'm fine now. I was just describing what lead to the cramp and the image forming of the intestine. Why I ate raw oats? I like to add as much raw uncooked food into my diet as I can, because I like the raw-food thing, and it generally makes me feel better, provided I remember to drink with it. Please stop being obnoxious.

And I am not avoiding Ness36's comments, I simply don't have the time to prepare a thorough reply to them just yet but I intend to. If I prepare answers to posts, I am criticized of writing too much, and when I simply don't have time to respond, I am criticized for that. Either way, I am attacked for anything I do or don't do, so I'll just make my own choices. You're just bickering people, this is not Skepticism.

You have time to write almost 1300 words describing something which could well have been a dream or a hypnopompic hallucination, but no time to address Ness36's posts?

And then back to the "whatever I do is wrong" martyr pose. There are insufficient rolleye pictures in the world to express my contempt at that position.
 

I was surprised also.  I've been a member there since 2001 and have been lurking here for quite awhile.  That asinine response was what made me so mad I had to register here just so I could get it out of my system.

Posted By Sasha on 19 Nov 2009 09:14 AM
I read your response to Ness36's comments on the JREF forum, VFF and I have to say it's one of the most arrogant and insulting replies I've seen anyone make. Since that particular thread is modified I doubt if I'd be allowed to make this statement there. You consistently whine about being "attacked" for what you say but replying to an intelligent, informative post with "What kind of chemist are you?" and other dunderheaded comments is the lamest way of trying to obfuscate the fact that you dug yourself into a hole with your latest silly claim.

Welcome, Sasha!

When someone who actually knows what they are talking about confronts Anita, she hides behind pseudo scientific babble speak and insults. We've seen it from her repeatedly over the last year.

She believes that she is a 'unique' paranormal claimant. She isn't. She's following "The Dummie's Guide to Paranormal Claims" just like all the rest of them.

"Dunderheaded". Good word.

Well, I think a combination of gases and hypnopompic hallucination probably accounts for that siesta-time 'perception' pretty well, actually.

I have the right to think the new photo of VFF is terribly unflattering- the white lipstck and the yellow stain and the 60's whirli-gig background don't do the woman justice. Granted, she's past her first youth, but I'm sure many would find her attractive; I see no need to go straight into a psychic hag format at 26.

Posted By desertgal on 19 Nov 2009 09:58 AM

Posted By Sasha on 19 Nov 2009 09:14 AM
I read your response to Ness36's comments on the JREF forum, VFF and I have to say it's one of the most arrogant and insulting replies I've seen anyone make. Since that particular thread is modified I doubt if I'd be allowed to make this statement there. You consistently whine about being "attacked" for what you say but replying to an intelligent, informative post with "What kind of chemist are you?" and other dunderheaded comments is the lamest way of trying to obfuscate the fact that you dug yourself into a hole with your latest silly claim.

Welcome, Sasha!

When someone who actually knows what they are talking about confronts Anita, she hides behind pseudo scientific babble speak and insults. We've seen it from her repeatedly over the last year.

She believes that she is a 'unique' paranormal claimant. She isn't. She's following "The Dummie's Guide to Paranormal Claims" just like all the rest of them.

"Dunderheaded". Good word.

Thanks desertgal.  I've been following the VFF saga since her first thread.  I'll be interested in the thing (test?, study?, demonstration?) this Saturday.  Is there a time scheduled yet for the broadcast?

 

Posted By VisionFromFeeling on 19 Nov 2009 08:36 AM

 

[snipperooni)

. You're just bickering people, this is not Skepticism.

No, as a matter of fact, this is Stop Vision From Feeling.   Do you really think this is your frakking fan club, you airhead?

We're here to shut you down, and your trite re-definitions mean squat.

Welcome to reality Anita, your worst nightmare..

 

Posted By VisionFromFeeling on 19 Nov 2009 08:36 AM

You guys are just rude.

Standard paranormal claimant redefining honesty.

Of course there is no "out" for the IIG test.

Except for "I have one of a kind synesthesia!" instead of "I have a paranormal ability!"

I'm fine now.

Who cares? If you are stupid enough to eat raw oats, without something to drink, then you deserve what you get. I do hope you meant Quaker Oats, and you didn't start grazing in a field? I noticed you didn't deny that.

I was just describing what lead to the cramp and the image forming of the intestine.

You were just describing another fantasy you had when you were half awake. Yawn.

Why I ate raw oats? I like to add as much raw uncooked food into my diet as I can, because I like the raw-food thing, and it generally makes me feel better, provided I remember to drink with it.

Of course you do. Now, is that a special dietary requirement for Arcturian grifter wannabees, or do you just not know how to cook?

Please stop being obnoxious.

The Queen of Arrogance has ruled. What website do you think you are visiting? As Akhenaten pointed out, this isn't your fan club. We call you according to reality. If you don't like it, maybe you should pull your head out of the dwarf stars and try a little dose of the real world yourself.

And I am not avoiding Ness36's comments, I simply don't have the time to prepare a thorough reply to them just yet but I intend to.

Right. With more pseudo scientific babble speak and insults. Make sure you have your paranormal claimant's guidebook handy.

Oh, wait. You'll probably respond after Saturday. Make sure you have your fake synesthestic guidebook handy.

 

If I prepare answers to posts, I am criticized of writing too much, and when I simply don't have time to respond, I am criticized for that.

B-O-O. H-O-O.

Either way, I am attacked for anything I do or don't do, so I'll just make my own choices.

Right. Since you've really considered anyone else's advice so far-NOT. And we all know where 'your own choices' will lead-more delusions, more fantasies, more babble speak...

You're just bickering people,

 Straight from that guidebook again. See, we're pointing out reality. You are pointing out VisionFromFantasies. That makes us real, and it makes you a fake. An unoriginal fake.

this is not Skepticism.

How would you know? You're a failure at  skepticism and science.

Posted By Sasha on 19 Nov 2009 11:25 AM
Just found the broadcast schedule: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/vision-from-feeling-demonstration - Sat. 11 AM Pacific time if anyone wants to kill some time they'll never get back.

I thought about it, but I have an appointment Saturday to yank out the hairs on my arms with red hot tweezers, and I think it will be more fun.

Posted By pakeha on 19 Nov 2009 10:02 AM

Well, I think a combination of gases and hypnopompic hallucination probably accounts for that siesta-time 'perception' pretty well, actually.

I have the right to think the new photo of VFF is terribly unflattering- the white lipstck and the yellow stain and the 60's whirli-gig background don't do the woman justice. Granted, she's past her first youth, but I'm sure many would find her attractive; I see no need to go straight into a psychic hag format at 26.

 Oh my pakeha, I think I peed my pants laughing at your comments.  The mystic hag look is definitely not good, I agree.

Edited to welcome Sasha to this site, hope you don't get a sore head banging it against your keyboard!