Register  
Sunday, May 20, 2012
Blog 
Blog
03

People are already speculating that PBJ, who was just banned from the JREF under mysterious circumstances, was me. I assure you that it was not me nor do I know who it is. I have a suspicion, but my suspicion merely points to an identity I know about but don't know the original banned identity. In other words I think it is "Y," but I  have no clue who "Y" is currently or who "Y" was previously.

Some won't believe PBJ's accusations, but to those of us who have experienced it first-hand, it has the ring of truth. You see, this is not the first time Darat has been caught in a lie. It happened back when I had my run-in with the Darat and Jeff Wagg nearly two years ago. The quick skinny is that I had asked to have my posting privileges suspended, so they set my account status to guest. I was still able to log in and (among other things) report posts, which I did several times. Darat got pissed that I reported a post by RSLancastr, so without telling me, he changed my password. I reset it using the automatic feature of the software. He then (again, without telling me), changed my e-mail address so the password resets wouldn't work. He claimed this was standard procedure, but it wasn't.

It's interesting that Darat says only people banned by mistake could be unbanned. I've had two sockpuppets banned due to me be careless in revealing my IP address. They combined for 300 posts and not a single one was moderated or sent to AAH. Several posts even got TLA nominations. I am currently using another sock without nary a moderated post. I know of other socks (we're on a bowling team together) who post without any problems. You can read the public notices and see several socks who were banned despite violating no other rules except for the one about having socks. I believe that PBJ has multiple socks with numerous posts because I've seen and done it myself.

To me this clearly indicates that at least in several cases, banning was the wrong corrective action. It should be reserved for the incorrigible and continually disruptive.

Addendum

Be critical thinkers, folks. Why would people suspect me?

There's a thread in Forum Management where I argued that it was inappropriate to have a thread discussing Randi's sexuality back when he "came out of the closet." So why would I comment on his sexuality now? It's irrelevant to the case - John Doe could have been his hunting buddy, and it would be the same.

I have argued multiple times that courts should consider the maturity of a minor in a statutory rape case because some minors are fully capable of consenting with an adult, and jailing someone because of a mere age difference is a zero tolerance policy that makes no sense (this assumes that the minor says that consent was given in the first place). So why would I argue that Randi took advantage of John Doe when John Doe was clearly an adult when they got together?

My socks are to demonstrate that my banning was a mistake. Why would I deliberately get one in trouble?

I am not the only one who thinks the admins are a little trigger happy when it comes to socks. This guy has had his account refused multiple times without ever having been a member there, and nobody would explain why.

Posted in: JREF

Comments

PBJ
# PBJ
Friday, November 04, 2011 4:26 PM
I am PBJ, and no, I am not UncaYimmy. Some of you may not belive that, and quite honestly there is no way to prove it, so you will have to take my word for it. You can accuse me of having multiple accounts at the JREF, and for that I am guilty, but I am NOT a liar.

I am posting here, because several posters in the "Who is/was PBJ" thread have accused UY of being PBJ, and a couple have even quasi linked over to this site. So rather than sacrifice another pawn (sock), I have decided to make my case here.

First off, I would like to apologize to Tricky and RemieV , I was browsing the "Jose Alvarez" thread on page 1 when I hit reply, hence my mistake about the RemieV and Tricky post. I was not lying as Lash L has suggested, it was my mistake. That, and I was having a bit of bourbon at the moment. (perhaps some mods can take note of this, accepting of guilt, and an honest apology)

None of that takes away from the fact that the post PBJ made did NOT violate the membership agreement of the JREF forum, and that Darat was lying when he banned that acount. That account was banned because it dared to look skeptically at Randi, and the skeptic's communty inability to discuss this situation in an honest way. PBJ/I was correct in his analogy of the Ted Haggard case and Randi's situation, the sheep will not look down, or speak ill, upon the sheppard.

Now, I will say that that I did send an email to randi@randi.org from my Hellsinki proxy, but Darat would have had zero evidence to tie them together prior to my sacrificing Hellsinki on page 1 of the PBJ thread. If he has it, I would again ask him to "show his work".

Someone replied from the randi@randi.org site with this reply;

"You do not exist...

James Randi."

I was kind of shocked, but the next day Hellsinki was approved. The day after that, PBJ was approved. Then I received a weird reply from Randi...

"Nor does anyone named "Mr. Zwinge" exist, either...

James Randi."

I believe I used his/Randi's birth name in my reply to original email...in any case, it was odd that he/whoever denied his existence.

Now, back to the point of all of this.

Why is it not allowed to discuss Randi's life in a skeptical manner? No one on the JREF, or any other skeptical board would/will just come out and say the truth....Randi and Deyvi have been lying about this situation for 30 years. It's not that big of a deal, I understand why they did it. Tsar Bomba's podcast really got me to thinking...why will no one in the skeptical community just talk about this situation like they would is it was OJ Simpson, or as I said as PBJ, Herman Cain?

Can you spell hipocrisy?

My reference to Randi's sexuality was in no way an attack on his being gay. In fact, I didn't even realize that people would take it that way and use it against me. Had Randi been a 50 yo man and hooked up with a hot teenage girl it would not have changed my take on the fact that Randi was after some young meat. Socrates would be proud.

Ok, I'll wrap this all up, I've made my point. It's time for the JREF to take a serious look at gettng some new admins that are willing to be honest with the board. Darat started a thread about admitting mistakes, and he ran away without ever admitting he makes mistakes! WTF?

The JREF is bar none the best debating/skeptical site on the internet and it needs to have mods and admins that can be held in high regard and tell the truth. I have been around since '03 and I do remember Mr. Wagg running the show. I can only say that things have only gotten progresively worse, and that's sad.

Sincerely,

PBJ/Hellsinki...

p.s. I even posted this through a proxy so UY would have no way to trace my IP and guess who I am.




UncaYimmy
# UncaYimmy
Friday, November 04, 2011 6:15 PM
Somebody made a sarcastic comment about me "moving on." Why should I move on? I enjoy reading and posting on the board and racked up 7,500+ posts over a few years. I'm not going to stop simply because an unpaid lackey made a controversial decision to ban my account. I'm not hurting anyone by posting there. In fact I am being treated exactly how I was before I presented my issues in Forum Management. It's like a honeymoon all over again.

@PBJ - I know what banned account you used before PBJ/Hellsinki. What I don't know is what account you used before that one. Trust me, this is not a guess. If you e-mail me, I'll tell you how I know.
PBJ
# PBJ
Saturday, November 05, 2011 8:54 AM
What I find most interesting in the thread over at the JREF concerning who is/was PBJ, is the blatant refusal of anyone to explore the possibility that PBJ's post about Randi (presently in AAH) did not violate any part of the membership agreement. It wasn't, in any way, attacking Randi or Deyvi, it was just simply looking at the situation without the fog of worship.

I find it somewhat humorous that on a board dedicated to critical thought, and for all intents and purposes, an atheist board, here we have a set of rules that resemble the dogmatic 10 commandments, all punishable by death if the gods so desire. And for the most part, the sheep stay within these rules, and learn to adjust their behavior in a way that will not upset the good shepherds.

Here are a few of the comments that strike me as the most interesting;

Phantom Wolf

So...let me summarize:

1) This person has created multiple accounts here, in knowing violation of the MA. In fact, the person doing this went to rather elaborate lengths to break the rules (and try to avoid being caught) by using a Singapore proxy and email account, set up apparently for the exclusive purpose of carrying out this bit of deception.

2) Darat says that the only reason this account was approved was because of emails received during the approval process; this person claims no such emails were ever sent. While I'd tend to take Darat's word over PBJ's, it is largely a moot point, since this person has already admitted to intentionally breaking the forum rules. Further, this person's post reveals that Darat and Lisa were apparently quite correct in being suspicious about this person.

3) This person comes back, using yet another sock puppet account, to "reveal the truth"...a 'truth' that, quite frankly, just makes them look like a complete farking idiot.

To whoever you are...if you have any other sock puppet accounts still active, and are reading this...if you ever have to go to court for anything, please don't be your own lawyer...because if your 'defense' is as inept and ill-conceived as what you've done here, you won't stand a chance. Case in point...making your email account available for others to view, a 'proof' of your claim...when pretty much anyone with the most basic computer knowledge knows that you could simply have deleted any emails sent/received. So you make a post that undeniably demonstrates your guilt, while posting 'evidence' of innocence that doesn't mean squat.


This type of post is very well thought out and intelligently presented, yet completely overlooks the fact that PBJ's post in no way violates the MA. He has a point about the emails, but like I have said in my first post here on UncaYimmy's blog, the emails were from the Hellsinki account, who was from Finland. There was no way prior to Hellsinki making a post in the PBJ thread, and falling on the sword if you will, of Darat tying the two together.

It should appear pretty obvious to all of you that I am still browsing the PBJ thread, and it would follow from that that I still have a few active accounts over there.

another post from page one;

Chaos


Not sure about Thunder´s articulateness, but attacking Randi wasn´t his shtick... nor Zep´s. Skeptic would have worked an accusation of anti-semitism and/or an attack on the "Canadian liberal leftist progressive" into this. And it´s too damn articulate for BAC, plus I´m not sure he´d attack Randi like this, either.

I´d say attacks like this are Gengis´ style, but I don´t recall him being anywhere near this articulate... or this sophisticated in his methods.

I know a couple of current members who are this rabidly opposed to homosexuality, but the rules prevent me from naming them here; other than that, I´d say the prime suspects are people who failed (or wisely refused to take) the Million Dollar Challenge.

I don't actually see where in PBJ's post that I was attacking Randi, had it been anyone else in the real world, like OJ Simpson, or Herman Cain PBJ would still be a member and have made a couple of friends.

I also find it of great interest how Chaos has spent the last two weeks attacking Darat, and I would assume nearly getting banned, yet here he is at the alter of Randi, offering his intellect to cast out the black sheep. Peace be upon him.

and I'll close out this post with this little gem from Darat;

Darat

Actually I can supply a bit more information. Emails were sent to Randi which were forwarded to me by D.J., emails between D.J., me and Lisa resulted in us deciding that we would test our suspicions. When both the PBJ and Helsinki accounts were approved Lisa made a post in the Coordination section to warn the Mod Team and ask them to keep an eye on the accounts.

As can be seen our suspicions were proved right.

Just as a bit of general information. There are some signs that indicate that an account request needs to be looked at more closely and Lisa and I often discuss accounts waiting for approval and the emails that are sent during that process. As ever what we look for and at is not rocket science but we don't describe our processes as I don't believe in making it easier for pillocks and/or malicious folk to bypass the very limited tools we have.



"As you can see our suspicions proved right". That's exactly the kind of phrase I would expect from some psychic after they suggested the police look for the body in the lake, even though the killer left a note saying he was leaving to go to the lake. Way to go Captain Obvious!

In my honest opinion, the admins are wasting a huge amount of time and resources on carrying out this death penalty, and making sure that the bodies don't float. There is no way to stop people from from self resurrecting and becoming members again, sure it takes three days and a couple registration attempts, but the gates of hell are always open.

If posting anything on the JREF that might look at Randi in a skeptical light is a crime punishable by instant death, then perhaps the admins should change the 13 commandments to include a new rule;

Rule -1 ; Thou shall have no other gods before our god, Mr Zwinge.

Ta Ta

Post Comment

Note: Because of all the spammers, all posts are manually approved. There are two ways to comment. You can register, but you do not need to supply your real name. However, you will need a valid e-mail address for the registration confirmation. Or you can can log in as JREF-Anon with the password being the first word in the name of the JREF forum where inappropriate posts are sent (all lowercase).
Only registered users may post comments.
 Print   
Copyright 2009-2012 by Jim Carr   |  Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use