Register  
Monday, February 06, 2012
Blog » Vision From Feeling 
Blog
12

Anita is wasting time over on the JREF Forums pretending like she's coming up with a way of testing her Missing Kidney Detector. Really, it's nothing more than a grab for attention, and the moderators at the JREF are playing into her hands. Even though Anita's threads keep getting closed or moderated, they allowed her to start yet another one. Why? I have no idea.

If the mods would just leave the thread alone, then it wouldn't be a problem. But no, they are not letting people say what needs to be said. They are helping Anita keep a "narrow focus" on the thread so she doesn't have to face reality. Fortunately, reality can be found right here.

She Won't Listen
Time and time again Anita has been given advice on how to properly test her claims. Time and time again Anita has refused that advice. She has no desire to actually do anything that might put her fantasy in jeapordy. It's insulting to all the people who have tried to help.

I actually created a health questionnaire for her to use a while back. Did she use it? No. She continued to do ad hoc readings, including the reading with Dr. Carlson where she failed to detect his missing kidney. Why didn't she use it when she talked about how brilliant it was?

After avoiding using the form, she decided to "modify" it for use in her "study." She ruined it. In fact her changes were so bad I made her disassociate my name from it. Everybody on the JREF Forums and at F-A-C-T told her what she did was terrible. She continued with it anyway, ignoring everyone's input.

That's just one story. There are plenty of others such as the lactobacillus testing where she refused to listen to people about how to test herself. She was told not to check her answer after each trial, but did she listen? No. We told her to set the number of runs in advance and not stop early or late. Did she listen? No.

Why should anyone waste time trying to "help" her now? She's not going to listen.

Easier Tests
The JREF Mods won't let anyone discuss any other methods for testing Anita's claims. Apparently if Anita says, "I am supernatural. Please help me prove it by designing a test to detect people missing a kidney" we ordinary folks are not allowed to say, "If you're supernatural, then here's a test you can do in an afternoon for less than $20." What has Anita ever done to warrant this much effort for a test? 

There's a reason that Anita wants to do this elaborate, time-consuming, and costly test: She knows it won't ever happen. She just wants it to sound like she's trying to prove her claims. It's like when she was going to do a "study" in a public park. She kept procrastinating, but we kept on her. Finally, she was backed into a corner and had to do something. What did she do? She called to ask "permission" to go to a public park. Huh? Needless to say, she got the park officials all riled up, so they asked that she write a letter. I guess they figure anybody asking permission to go a public park must be up to something very strange.

Their response to her was in effect, "you cannot set up tables nor will we set aside space for you. Of course, you can reserve a pavilion like anyone else. Otherwise, you can do whatever you want. It's a public park." She told us this meant she couldn't do her study in the park, and she backed out. She published the letters, but faced with plain English she refused to believe that she was allowed to go to the park and ask people if she could look at them.

That's just one story that is part of a pattern of evasiveness when it comes to testing. People can and should be allowed to call her on it. She doesn't really want to take a test, and people should be allowed to show that. C'mon, she's talking about paying to fly out of state for a test and to pay for sonograms, yet when it came to the crushed pill test she said she couldn't afford to buy a couple of generic OTC meds from the drugstore for comparison.

Sometimes a spade needs to be called a spade. Pretending that Anita is genuinely looking for assistance is a disservice to everyone involved.

Comments

Audible Click
# Audible Click
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 5:47 PM
From Anita in post # 96:

There will always be countless of parameters, such as lighting, room temperature, air humidity, what I ate for breakfast, etc., so it is important that just before having the test I confirm that I am happy with the conditions.

So, as usual, she's already lining up excuses for failing.
McLuvin
# McLuvin
Friday, August 14, 2009 9:27 AM
One minute she's saying she can't see through a thick sweater then a few posts later that they can wear whatever they like!

and what about the tiredness excuse? Why not just try 10 or more kidney detections at home with friends and grandad , thats what self testing means .

We don't want to hear in New York that she's too tired or the clothes are too thick.

Stop wasting everyones time u daft bint!!

Farencue
# Farencue
Monday, August 17, 2009 6:54 PM
It is unbelieveable that despite meeting Dr Carlson and knowing that he does not think Anita has a testable claim, she chooses to ignore him and have "on hold" 3 skeptical organisations to test her for a missing kidney.
Truly a child's case of "I will show you that I detected your missing kidney Dr Carlson even though I didn't mention it".

That Anita continues to post so much garbage although she has been called out on that garbage, shows that she has been humiliated by the FACT group (unintentionally of course) and is desperately trying to regain her pride.

UncaYimmy
# UncaYimmy
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 1:22 AM
Let's not forget that she said she could see inside containers containing nitrogen, but she cannot do a reading through a thin, opaque screen with a chalk outline of exactly where the person will be standing.
derardi
# derardi
Thursday, September 24, 2009 5:51 AM
could we not hold her feet to the fire on the nitrogen claim and all that it entails? derardi

Post Comment

Note: Because of all the spammers, all posts are manually approved. There are two ways to comment. You can register, but you do not need to supply your real name. However, you will need a valid e-mail address for the registration confirmation. Or you can can log in as JREF-Anon with the password being the first word in the name of the JREF forum where inappropriate posts are sent (all lowercase).
Only registered users may post comments.
 Print   
Copyright 2009-2011 by Jim Carr   |  Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use